Выберите язык:
RU EN
Наши телефоны:
(3822) 52-75-22
mednord-t

Possibilities for monitoring the pharmacodynamics of dabigatran etexilate

M.A. Solovyev, D.A. Momot, L.Y. Kotlovskaya, I.I. Tyutrin, V.V. Udut

The sensitivity and prognostic significance of laboratory tests and methods for assessing pharmacodynamics in relation to the system of regulation of the aggregate state of blood after a single dose of dabigatran etexilate at a dosage of 150 mg were investigated. Determination of the functional state of the hemostatic potential of native blood was carried out using thromboelastography (before and after 2, 4, 12 hours after taking the drug) and low-frequency piezothromboelastography (before taking the drug and after 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours after taking the drug). In parallel with the study of changes in the viscoelastic properties of native blood, the dynamics of the activated partial thromboplastin time was monitored (before taking the drug and 2, 4 and 12 hours after taking the drug).

According to the results of LFPTEG, the maximum severity of the direct pharmacodynamic effect of dabigatran etexilate was recorded 4 hours after taking the drug (which was reflected by a pronounced decrease in the efficiency of the proteolytic stage of fibrinogenesis) with the return of the activity of the proteolytic stage of fibrinogenesis to the initial level at 8 hours with the retention of residual antithrombotic activity up to 12 hours.

The use of thromboelastography was limited to a 4-hour interval, while the APTT test was limited to 2 hours from the moment of taking the drug, after which the level of indicators returned to the initial value.

Keywords: system of regulation of the aggregate state of blood, dabigatran etexilate, hemocoagulation, hemostatic potential, whole blood, global tests, low-frequency piezothromboelastography.

Introduction. To date, antithrombotic therapy has a wide range of anticoagulant agents to offer, including a group of direct oral anticoagulants (DOA), associated with new opportunities for pharmacological thrombosis prevention. Distinctive features of this group of drugs are oral administration, targeted action (factor Xa: apixaban and rivaroxaban, factor IIa: dabigatran), and absence of the need for laboratory control of therapy — a feature that most clinicians would appreciate [17]. Dabigatran is the first DOA group drug approved for use in clin- ical practice. Its efficacy and safety have been confirmed in several studies [15], specifically, RE-MODEL (2007), RE-NOVATE (2007), RELY (2009), RE-COVER (2009), REMEDY (2013), RE-SONATE (2013), RE-ALIGN (2013), RE-DUAL PCI (2017), RESPECT ESUS (2019), RE- SPECT CVT (2019).

However, the actual clinical safety and efficacy of the drug observed in the course of routine practice differ from the data obtained in the phase III of clinical trials [2,13], which creates presuppositions for ethical contradictions among practitioners. For instance, the RE-CIRCUIT study (2017) designed to compare the efficacy/safety of dabigatran and warfarin in patients with mechanical heart valves revealed an increased incidence of thromboembolism and hemorrhagic complications in patients receiving dabigatran [8], which was the reason for the early termination of the study. As demon- strated in the work [11], the use of dabiga- tran, compared to warfarin, is associated with an increased risk of major bleedings, a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, but a lower risk of intracranial hemor- rhages. There has also been a number of reports of severe/fatal bleeding in elderly and senile patients [5, 6, 19]. In addition, hypercoagulation that develops after dis- continuation of administering dabigatran may also be a significant concern [14]. Thus, lack of laboratory control of dabig- atran therapy is quite a significant prob- lem [7].

Currently, dabigatran is recommended as a first-line drug for the treatment of venous thromboembolic complications in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, with advised twice-daily intake of 150 mg [18]. The recommendations for monitoring the efficacy and safety are reduced to the analysis of clinical data (examination findings, medical history) using specialised scales (HAS-BLED, CHA2DS2-VASc, etc.). This approach lacks any objective criteria for the assessment of the functional state of the hemostatic potential – an integrative component of the full-cycle hemocoag- ulation, which ensures the necessary blood fluidity and restricts extravasation of blood components in cases of disrup- tion of the vascular wall integrity or any damage to it [1,3].

A number of laboratory tests have been proposed to monitor the efficacy/ safety of dabigatran, including activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), ecar- in blood clotting time (ECT) and diluted thrombin time (Hemoclot) [4]. All these tests have similar disadvantages: they analyse only a certain «cluster» of hemocoagulation but are not implemented in routine clinical practice (ECT, Hemoclot) and have a low level of standardisation [9, 10, 16].

Dabigatran is known to have an effect not only on free thrombin (and, as a result, on the plasma component of hemostasis), but also on thrombin associated with the formation of fibrin clots, and on the thrombin-induced platelet activation [12], reducing the level of their participation in thrombogenesis. In addition to the weakened functional responses of platelets mediated through PARs receptors, the cellular component is alsoaffected by other components of anti-thrombotic therapy (two- or three-component therapy) prescribed together with dabigatran. This is what identifies the need not only to assess the «peak» effect of dabigatran, determined by integrative hemostasis tests, but also to assess the effect of a combination of anti-thrombotic agents on the hemostatic potential, in general, taking into account the cellular component of hemostasis. Thus, the problem discussed above entails the need to develop an algorithm for evaluating the efficacy/safety of dabigatran which would meet the following criteria: (I) it could be performed using native blood; (II) it would provide information on all components of fibrinogenesis (starting from initiation/amplification to the formation of cross-linked fibrin and possible clot lysis), and (iii) it could be carried out in the «Point-of-care testing» mode.

To date, the integral characteristic of the hemostatic potential of native blood can only be obtained using such «global» hemostasis system tests as the rotational (TEG, ROTEM) and vibration (LFPTEG) viscometry. These methods determine changes in the physical state of blood, however they show a fundamental difference when it comes to the comparison of the informative value of the data obtained – the LFPTEG method registers changes in blood viscosity at the initial stages of fibrinogenesis, in the time interval that is identified as the «lag-time» in the TEG [1,3]. This allows us to analyse the intensity of hemocoagulation during the initiation/amplification phases and to determine the activity of the proteolytic stage of fibrinogenesis, whereas the TEG and ROTEM methods provide information only on the post-coagulation phase of fibrinogenesis.

The objective of this study was a comparative assessment of the informative value of global tests of the hemostasis system in relation to the control of the efficacy of dabigatran etexilate.

Materials and methods. The study was conducted at the clinic of the E. D. Goldberg Research Institute of Pharmacology and Regenerative Medicine. Thirty healthy male volunteers participated in the study after signing a voluntary informed consent. The criteria for the volunteer selection for the study is presented in Table 1.

Apart from medical history check (identification of complaints), the screening stage included general and biochemical blood tests. The general blood test was performed on whole stabilized venous blood using an ABX Micros ES 60 analyzer (HORIBA ABX SAS, France). The biochemical blood test was performed on citrate plasma (alkaline phosphatase and total bilirubin were checked on se- rum) using an automatic biochemical analyzer Erba Mannheim XL 200 (ErbaLachema, Czech Republic). At the end of the screening, provided that the selection criteria were met, the participants’ hemostatic potential was monitored over time after a single 150 mg dose of dabigatran etexilate (Pradaxa, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Germany).

APTT was determined on platelet-poor plasma using a 4-channel semi-automatic coagulometer Amelung KC 4 delta (TRINITY Biotech, Ireland) 2, 4, and 12 hours after the drug intake.

TEG was performed on native ve- nous blood taken without a tourniquet, using a TEG 5000 thromboelastograph (Haemoscope Corporation, USA). The pharmacodynamics of dabigatran were monitored 2 and 12 hours after the drug intake; the following TEG parameters were evaluated:

- R (min) – the time from the start of the test to the detection of signs of thrombosis (when the signal reaches an amplitude of 2 mm).

- Angle α (°) – the angle constructed tangentially to the TEG from the point of the beginning of the clot formation, which reflects the rate of growth of the fibrin formation and its structure (increase in the clot strength).

- K (min) – the time of initial thrombosis (reaching the signal amplitude of 20 mm).

- MA, mm – the maximum amplitude of the curve that characterizes the maximum dynamic properties of the connection between fibrin and platelets and shows the content of fibrinogen and the maximum clot strength.

The hemostatic potential was determined using the LFPTEG method on native venous blood collected from the vein in the bend of the elbow joint without a tourniquet, using the ARP-01M Mednord thromboelastograph (Registration certificate of Federal service for surveillance inhealthcare No 2010/09767). The estimated parameters of the piezothromboelastogram are given in Table 2; the approximation of the estimated parameters to the piezothromboelastogram curve is shown in Figure 1.

Statistical processing of the obtained data was carried out using the IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0 programme. To check the null hypothesis, the comparison of the in- dependent study groups was conducted using the Mann-Whitney test; the differ- ences were recognized as statistically valid at a significance level of p < 0.05. Quantitative indicators are presented as Me [LQ; Uq], where Me is the median, LQ (Q25) is the lower quartile, and UQ (Q75) is the upper quartile.

Results of the research. Dabigatran showed the maximum anticoagulant effect in 2-4 hours after the drug intake (Tables 3-4).

The statistically significant differences in the APTT index compared to the baseline level were recorded only at the start of the second hour after dabigatran intake (an increase of 1.38 times, p = 0.001). TEG demonstrated quite a significant period of time: the second hour showed lengthening of the time of the be- ginning of clot formation (R increase by 1.11 times, p = 0.009), reduced growth rate of the fibrin formation (alpha angle value decrease by 1.08 times, p = 0.001) and a decrease of the maximum density of the clot (MA decrease by 1.1 times, p=0.001). The changes in level of indicators that are characteristic of structural hypocoagulation persisted for 4 hours: a decrease in the intensity of fibrinogenesis (alpha angle value decrease by 1.05 times, p=0.001) and a decrease in the maximum clot density (MA decrease by 1.09 times, p=0.001) were recorded. In 12 hours after dabigatran intake, no statistically significant differences between the parameters of the thromboelastogram and the initial parameters were registered.

LFPTEG was the most informative of all the used methods (Table 4).

According to the results of the LFPTEG, the effect of dabigatran was registered on the 2nd hour after the drug intake, and the maximum effect wasreached after 4 hours.

In a two-hour interval after the dabigatran intake, the hemostatic potential was characterized by a decrease in the overall intensity of hemocoagulation (ITC decrease by 1.22 times, p = 0.016). Mod- erate anticoagulation occurred due to an increase in the suspension stability (t1 increase by 3.07 times, p = 0.001), reduction of the intensity of proteolytic stage of clot formation (CTA and ICD levels decreased by 2.57 times (p = 0.016) and 1.9 times (p = 0.002), respectively), as well as an increase in the time of blood gelation (t3 increase by 3.07 times, p = 0,018). In addition, a decrease in anticoagulant activity against the background of chronometric hypocoagulation was registered (TAAF decrease by 1.82 times, p = 0.002).

The «peak» action of dabigatran is characterised by a general decrease in the intensity of coagulation (ITC decrease by 1.22 times, p = 0.01): increased suspension stability of the blood (t1 increase by 3.15 times, p = 0.001), decreased in- tensity of proteolytic stage fibrinogenesis (CTA and ICD levels decreased by 3.33 times (p = 0.003) and 2.01 times (p = 0.001) respectively), and an increase in the time of blood gelation (t3 increase by 2.05 times, p = 0.003) compared to the baseline level. Against the background of a general decrease in the intensity of fibrinogenesis, a decrease in the intensity of the anticoagulant potential (TAAF decrease by 1.82 times, p = 0.001) was also registered with regard to the baseline level.

In 8 hours after the drug intake, a number of indicators returned to the initial level (CTA and t3). At the same time, a decrease in the level of the t1 indicator was recorded simultaneously with an increase in the levels of ITC and TAAF indicators, which demonstrated a shift in the hemostatic potential towards normal coagulation, which returned to the previous level of hypocoagulation in 12 hours.

The hypocoagulation state of the hemostatic potential remained for up to 12 hours after the drug intake (ITC decrease by 1.2 times, p = 0.024): suspension stability of the blood remained (t1 increase by 1.66 times, p = 0.015), and the intensity of fibrinogen proteolysis decreased (ICD decrease by 1.48, p = 0.035). At the 24th hour of the study, the HP of the healthy volunteers was characterized by a normal coagulation state comparable to the baseline level. However, at the final point, all volunteers registered an isolated increase in the aggregation activity of the blood corpuscles, which was evidences by an increase in ICC value by 1.71 times (p = 0.029) compared to the initial value. The change of this parameter over time shows an isolated increase in the aggregation activity of the blood corpuscles, observed after the end of the drug effect.

Conclusion. This article presents the results of comparative monitoring of the pharmacodynamics of dabigatran etexilate after a single intake of 150 mg of the drug by healthy male volunteers with a local APTT hemostasis test, as well as global tests — TEG and LFPTEG.

The APTT test showed informative value only at the «peak» of the dabigatran action (2 hours after the intake), since the blood test sample taken in 4 hours after the intake did not show any statistically significant differences if compared to the baseline level.

The possibility of a longer monitoring of the pharmacodynamics of dabigatran was identified in a study using native blood.

Thromboelastography performed on native blood for the purpose of monitoring the pharmacodynamics of dabigatran proved not to be informative enough – a decrease in the rate of formation (R and α angle indicators), gelation and density of the fibrin-platelet structure (MA indicator) was observed against the background of the maximum effect of dabigatran. However, in 12 hours after dabigatran intake, no statistically significant differences between the parameters of the thromboelastogram and the initial parameters were registered. Thus, the method of thromboelastography was not informative enough to be used for dynamic monitoring of the hemostatic potential, since for the most part it displayed only structural hypocoagulation observed after dabigatran intake and showed practically no chronometric hypocoagulation.

And vice version, the LFPTEG method, which demonstrated the largest time range of the possibility of registering the action of dabigatran, predominantly recorded changes in parameters reflecting the chronometric hypocoagulation of the initial stages, a decrease in the intensity of the proteolytic stage of fibrinogenesis, and an increase in the time of blood gelation. In response to a decrease in the intensity of clot formation, a decrease in the total anticoagulant activity of the blood was recorded. In contrast to the data obtained by the TEG method, according to the results of the LFPTEG over 24 hours, there was no decrease in the intensity of fibrin polymerization, the time of formation of cross-linked fibrin and the maximum polymerization stage of fibrinogenesis. Also, the LFPTEG method in all study participants at the 24th hour after taking dabigatran showed an isolated increase in the aggregation activity of blood corpuscles. Given the absence of changes in the dynamics of aggregation of blood corpuscles during induced hypocoagulation and its intensification after the end of the action of the anticoagulant, it becomes necessary to conduct further studies with a closer study of platelet aggregation.

References.

1. Тютрин И.И. Низкочастотная пьезотром- боэластография цельной крови: алгоритмы диагностики и коррекции гемостазиологиче- ских расстройств / И.И. Тютрин, В.В. Удут. – Томск: Издат. дом Томского государственного университета, 2016. – С. 170. [Tyutrin II, Udut VV. Low-frequency piezothromboelastography of whole blood: algorithms for the diagnosis and cor- rection of hemostasiological disorders. Publishing House of Tomsk State University. 2016: 170. (In Russ.).]

2. Удут В.В. Реалии и перспективы глобаль- ных тестов в оценке функционального состо- яния про- и антикоагулянтной системы / В.В. Удут, И.И. Тютрин, М.А. Соловьев // Бюллетень экспериментальной биологии и медицины. – 2015. – Т. 159, No2. – С. 162-165. [Udut VV., Tyutrin II., Solovyev MA. Realities and prospects of global tests in assessing the functional state of the pro- and anticoagulant system. Byulleten' ek- sperimental'noj biologii i mediciny. 2015; 159 (2): 162-165. (In Russ.).]

3. Удут В.В. Технология низкочастотной пъезотромбоэластографии в мониторинге про- тивотромботической терапии / В.В. Удут, И.И. Тютрин, М.А. Соловьев // Экспериментальная и клиническая фармакология. – 2017. — Т. 80, No11. – С.10-17. [Udut VV, Tyutrin II, Solovyev MA. Low-frequency piezothromboelastography technology in monitoring anti-thrombotic thera- py. Eksperimental'naya i klinicheskaya farma- kologiya. 2017; 80 (11): 10-17. (In Russ.).] DOI: 10.30906/0869-2092-2019-82-7-10-13

4. Albaladejo P., Pernod G., Godier A. Manage- ment of bleeding and emergency invasive proce- dures in patients on dabigatran: Updated guide- lines from the French Working Group on Periop- erative Haemostasis (GIHP) — September 2016. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2018;37(4):391- 399. DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2018.04.009

5. Cano E.L., Miyares M.A. Clinical chal- lenges in a patient with dabigatran-induced fatal hemorrhage. Am J Geriatr Pharmacoth- er. 2012;10(2):160-163. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjop- harm.2012.02.004

6. Chen B.C., Viny A.D., Garlich F.M. Hemor- rhagic complications associated with dabigatran use. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2012;50(9):854-857. DOI: 10.3109/15563650.2012.721888

7. Cohen D. Dabigatran: how the drug company withheld important analyses. BMJ. 2014;349:g4670. Published 2014 Jul 23. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g4670

8. Eikelboom J.W., Connolly S.J., Brueck- mann M. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with mechanical heart valves. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(13):1206-1214. DOI: 10.1056/NEJ- Moa1300615.

9. Gosselin R.C., Adcock D.M. The labora- tory’s 2015 perspective on direct oral anticoag- ulant testing [published correction appears in J Thromb Haemost. 2019 Apr;17(4):698]. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14(5):886-893. DOI: 10.1111/ jth.13266

10. Gosselin R.C., Douxfils J. Ecarin based co- agulation testing. Am J Hematol. 2020;95(7):863- 869. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25852

11. Hernandez I., Baik S.H., Piñera A., Zhang Y. Risk of bleeding with dabigatran in atrial fibrilla- tion [published correction appears in JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1732]. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(1):18-24. DOI: 10.1001/jamaint- ernmed.2014.5398

12. https://www.boehringer-ingelheim.ru/sites/ ru/files/files/pradaxa_150_mg_19-08-2020.pdf

13. Jelliffe R., Christians U. The New Di- rect-Acting Oral Anticoagulants Need to be Mon- itored!. Ther Drug Monit. 2020;42(3):357-359. DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000745

14. Kim J., Jang H.J., Schellingerhout D. Short-Term Cessation of Dabigatran Caus- es a Paradoxical Prothrombotic State. Ann Neurol. 2021;89(3):444-458. DOI: 10.1002/ ana.25964

15. Romiti G.F., Corica B., Proietti M. A com- prehensive appraisal of dabigatran etexilate clin- ical evidence and applications: a 10-year-long story. Future Cardiol. 2021;17(2):215-226. DOI: 10.2217/fca-2020-0084

16. Solbeck S., Ostrowski S.R., Stensballe J., Johansson P.I. Thrombelastography detects dabigatran at therapeutic concentrations in vi- tro to the same extent as gold-standard tests. Int J Cardiol. 2016;208:14-18. DOI: 10.1016/j. ijcard.2016.01.148

17. Stangier J. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the oral direct thrombin in- hibitor dabigatran etexilate. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2008;47(5):285-295. DOI: 10.2165/00003088- 200847050-00001

18. Wigle P., Hein B., Bernheisel C.R. An- ticoagulation: Updated Guidelines for Out- patient Management. Am Fam Physician. 2019;100(7):426-434.

19. Wychowski M.K., Kouides P.A. Dabiga- tran-induced gastrointestinal bleeding in an elder- ly patient with moderate renal impairment. Ann Pharmacother. 2012;46(4):e10. DOI: 10.1345/ aph.1Q747

SOLOVYOV Maxim Alexandrovich – Candidate of Medical Sciences, PhD, Research Institute of Pharmacology and Regenerative Medicine named after E.D. Goldberg Tomsk NIMC RAS, m.a.solovyev@mail.ru;

MOMOT Dmitry Andreevich – student of the Altai State Medical University. University, Barnaul;

KOTLOVSKAYA Larisa Yuryevna – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Research Institute of Pharmacology and Regenerative Medicine named after E.D. Goldberg Tomsk NIMC RAS;

TYUTRIN Ivan Illarionovich – MD, Professor. Siberian State med. University, Tomsk;

UDUT Vladimir V. – MD, Prof., Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of the Lab. E.D. Goldberg Research Institute of Pharmacology and Regenerative Medicine of the Tomsk Research Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

4(76) `2021
YAKUT MEDICAL JOURNAL

Карта поставок
Архангелская область
  • Архангельский клинический онкологический диспансер
Хабаровский край
  • "Амурская ЦРБ", г. Амурск
  • "Родильный дом №1", г. Хабаровск
  • "301 Военный клинический госпиталь", г. Хабаровск
Забайкальский край
  • «Государственная медицинская академия», г. Чита
Республика Бурятия
  • «ГК БСМП им. В. В. Ангапова», г. Улан-Удэ
  • РКБ им. Н. А. Семашко, г. Улан-Удэ
  • Отделенческая больница ОАО "РЖД", г. Северобайкальск
Алтайский край
  • “Городская больница №2”, г. Бийск
  • “Федеральный центр травматологии, ортопедии и эндопротезирования”, г. Барнаул
  • Перинатальный центр, г. Барнаул
Кемеровская область
  • "Городская клиническая больница №2", г. Кемерово
  • "НИИ комплексных проблем сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний", г. Кемерово
  • "Городская клиническая больница 5", г. Новокузнецк
  • "Зональный перинатальный центр", г. Новокузнецк
  • "Родильный дом 3", г. Новокузнецк
  • "Медлайн", г. Кемерово
Томская область
  • "«НИИ курортологии и физиотерапии ФМБА", г. Томск
  • «Городская больница №3», г. Томск
  • «Детская городская больница №1» , г. Томск
  • «ГБСМП», г. Томск
  • «Томская ЦРБ», г. Томск
  • «Асиновская ЦРБ», г. Асино
  • «Каргасокская ЦРБ», Каргасок
  • «Кривошеинская ЦРБ», Кривошеино
  • «Молчановская ЦРБ», Молчанов
  • «Парабельская ЦРБ», Парабель
  • «Колпашевская ЦРБ», г. Колпашево
  • «Первомайская ЦРБ», Первомайское
  • ГУ НИИ фармакологии ТНЦ СО РАМН, г. Томск
  • «Томский областной онкологический диспансер», г. Томск
  • «Томская областная клиническая туберкулезная больница», г. Томск
  • «Сибирский государственный медицинский университет», г. Томск
  • «Ваш доктор рядом», г. Томск
  • «Институт мужского здоровья», г. Томск
Ямало-Ненецкий автономный округ
  • «Ноябрьская ЦРБ», г. Ноябрьск,
  • «Городская больница», г. Губкинский
  • «Новоуренгойская ЦРБ», г. Новый Уренгой
  • «Надымская ЦРБ», г. Надым
  • «Окружная клиническая больница», г. Салехард
  • "Городская больница", г. Муравленко
Омская область
  • «Клинический онкологический диспансер», г. Омск.
  • «Государственная медицинская академия», г. Омск.
  • «Западно-Сибирский медицинский центр ФМБА», г. Омск.
Астраханская область
  • "Клинический родильный дом", г. Астрахань
Республика Башкортостан
  • "“Республиканский кардиологический диспансер”, г. Уфа
Республики Татарстан:
  • ГАУЗ "Городская больница №2", г. Набережные Челны
  • «Детская республиканская клиническая больница» г. Казань.
Самарская область
  • «Сызранская центральная городская больница», г. Сызрань
  • «Городская клиническая больница № 2 имени Н.А. Семашко», г. Самара
  • "Областная клиническая больница", г. Самара
  • «Противотуберкулезный диспансер», г. Тольятти
Пензенская область
  • «Земетчинская ЦРБ», п.г.т. Земетчино
  • «Каменская ЦРБ», г. Каменка
  • «Кузнецкая ЦРБ», г. Кузнецк
  • «Нижнеломовская ЦРБ», г. Нижний Ломов
  • «Сердобская ЦРБ», г. Сердобск
Нижегородская область
  • "Родильный дом №4" г. Нижний Новгород
    • ПОМЦ ФМБА России, г. Нижний Новогород
    • "Родильный дом" г. Арзамас
    • "Перинатальный центр", г. Дзержинск
Тульская область
  • «Городская больница №1″, г. Донской
Рязанская область
  • «Касимовская ЦРБ», г. Касимов
  • «Городская клиническая больница №8″, г. Рязань
Москва и Московская область
  • “Родильный дом №6 им.А.А. Абрикосовой “, г. Москва
  • "Многопрофильная клиника "Союз", г. Москва
  • "ЦКБ РАН", г. Москва
  • "Клиническая больница №123 ФМБА", г. Одинцово
  • Ветеринарная клиника «Белый клык», г. Москва
  • МЦ "Вита Медикус", г. Видное
  • Мединцентр ГлавУпдк при МИД РФ, г. Москва
  • Московский областной онкологический диспансер, г. Балашиха
  • Родильный дом, г. Сергиев Пасад,
  • Родильный дом, г. Раменское,
  • МЦ "Виталис", г. Москва
  • "Одинцовская РБ №2", с. Перхушково
  • ГКБ №45, г. Звенигород
  • ФГБОУ ВО МГМСУ им. А.И. Евдокимова
  • Федеральный научно-клинический центр реаниматологии и реабилитологии
  • "Одинцовская РБ №3", с. Никольское
  • "Клиника ЛМС", г. Москва
Санкт-Петербург и Ленинградская область
  • «Клиническая больница № 122 имени Л.Г. Соколова ФМБА", г. Санкт-Петербург»
  • "MedSwiss", г. Санкт-Петербург
  • "Волосовская ЦРБ", г. Волосов
  • "Токсовская РБ", г. Токсово
  • Перинатальный центр, г. Гатчина
  • "Родильный дом №16", г. Санкт-Петербург
  • СПБ ГБУЗ "Госпиталь для ветеранов войн", г. Санкт-Петербург
  • ГБУЗ "Больница Боткина", г. Санкт-Петербург
  • ЗАО "Ассоциация разработчиков и производителей систем мониторинга "АСМ"", г. Санкт-Петербург
  • Петербургский филиал ядерной физики им. Константинова, г. Гатчина
Пермский край
  • «Ордена «Знак Почета» краевая клиническая больница», г. Пермь
  • «Краевая больница № 3 «Центр диализа», г. Пермь
  • "Городская клиническая больница им. М.А. Тверье", г. Пермь
Ярославская область
  • «Ярославский государственный педагогический университет им. К.Д. Ушинского», г. Ярославль
  • ГУЗ ЯО КБ №9 г.Ярославль
  • ГУЗ ЯО КБ №2 г.Ярославль
Сахалинская область
  • «Южно-Курильская ЦРБ», о. Шикотан
Костромская область
  • МЧУ ДПО Нефросовет, г. Кострома
  • "Медицинский центр Мирт", г. Кострома
Удмурская республика
  • Ижевская Государственная Медицинская Академия, Ижевск
  • Глазоваская ЦРБ, Глазов
Тверская область
  • ГБУЗ Областной клинический перинатальный центр имени Е.М. Бакуниной, г. Тверь
Свердловская область
  • "Ревдинская ЦГБ", Ревдино
  • "ФГБУ "НИИ ОММ", г. Екатеринбург
  • Противотуберкулёзный диспансер, г. Екатеринбург
  • "Родильный дом №1", г. Нижний Тагил
  • "Госпиталь восстановительных инновационных технологий", г. Нижний Тагил
  • "Алапаевская городская больница", г. Алапаевск
  • "Талицкая ЦРБ", г. Талицк
  • "Белоярская ЦРБ", г. Белоярск
Республика Дагестан
  • Перинатальный центр, г. Хасавюрт
  • Перинатальный центр, г. Махачкала
Волгоградская область
  • БСМП №25, г. Волгоград
  • Родильный дом №1, г. Волгоград
  • Родильный дом №2, г. Волгоград
  • БУЗ "Волгоградский областной клинический кардиологический центр"
  • КБ №4, г. Волгоград
Курганская область
  • Перинатальный центр, Курган
Оренбуржская область
  • Перинатальный центр, г. Оренбург
Новосибирская область
  • НИИТО, г. Новосибирск
  • СОМЦ ФМБА, г. Новосибирск
  • НГМУ, г. Новосибирск
  • Городская клиническая больница №34, г. Новосибирск
  • НИМЦ им. ак. Е.Н.Мешалкина, г. Новосибирск
Ростовская область
  • Перинатальный центр, г. Ростов
  • Родильный дом", г. Таганрог
  • Родильный дом №5, г. Ростов
  • ГБСМП, г. Шахты
  • ФГБУЗ ЮОМЦ ФМБА, г. Ростов
  • Городская больница №7, г. Ростов
Мурманская область
  • Родильный дом №3, г. Мурманск
Брянская область
  • Перинатальный центр, г. Брянск
  • ГАУЗ Городская больница №2, г. Брянск
  • ГАУЗ Городская больница №1, г. Брянск
Воронежская область
  • Областная клиническая больница, г. Воронеж
  • Воронежская областная детская клиническая больница № 1, г. Воронеж
  • ВГКБСМП № 8,г.Воронеж
  • ВГКБ № 3,г.Воронеж
  • Калачевская РБ,г.Калач
  • Новохоперская РБ»,г.Новохоперск
  • Острогожская РБ,г.Острогожск
  • Павловская РБ,г.Павловск
  • ВРД № 3,г.Воронеж
  • Россошанская РБ,г.Россошь
  • ВГКБСМП № 10,г.Воронеж
  • Бобровская РБ,г.Бобров
  • ОДКБ № 2,г.Воронеж
  • ВГКБСМП №1,г.Воронеж
  • Семилукская РБ им.А.В.Гончарова,г.Семилуки
  • Лискинская РБ,г.Лиски
  • Батрулиновская РБ,г.Батрулиновка
  • Хохольская РБ,Хохольский р/п
Кабардино-Балкария
  • Перинатальный центр, г. Нальчик
Красноярский край
  • Родильный дом №4, г. Красноярск
    • Родильный дом №2, г. Красноярск
    • Перинатальный центр, г. Норильск
Республика САХА (Якутия)
  • «Республиканская больница №2 – Центр экстренной медицинской помощи», г. Якутск
  • «Республиканская больница №1 -Национальный центр медицины», г. Якутск
  • «Якутская городская клиническая больница», г. Якутск
  • «Алданская центральная районная больница», г. Алдан
  • НПЦ «Фтизиатрия, г. Якутск
Республика Адыгея
  • «Городская клиническая больница», г. Майкоп
Республика Узбекистан
  • «Республиканский специализированный научно-практический медицинский центр акушекрства и гинекологии», г. Ташкент

Акмолинская область (Казахстан)
  • "Центр охраны материнства и детства", г. Астана
  • "Перинатальный центр", г. Кокчетав

Саратовская область
  • Городская клиническая больница №10, г. Саратов

Ульяновская область
  • Перинатальный центр, г. Ульяновск

Челябинская область
  • Городская больница №2, г. Миасс
  • Частный центр "Источник", г. Челябинск
  • Городская клиническая больница №1, г. Челябинск
  • Городская клиническая больница №6, г. Челябинск
  • ОКБ №2, г. Челябинск
  • Городская клиническая больница №9, г. Челябинск
  • ОКБ №3, г. Челябинск

Краснодарский край
  • Противотуберкулезный диспансер, г. Краснодар
  • Городская больница №3, г. Краснодар

Республика Крым
  • Клиника "Генезис", г. Симферополь
  • ГБ №5, г. Севастополь
  • ГКБ №7, г. Симферополь
  • Ленинская ЦРБ

Псковская область
  • Перинатальный центр, г. Псков

Республика Карелия
  • Перинатальный центр, г. Петрозаводск

Иркутская область
  • Боханская ЦРБ, г. Бохан
  • Многопрофильная медицинская клиника "Союз", г. Иркутск

Владимирская область
  • Перинатальный центр, г. Владимир

Восточно-Казахстанская область (Казахстан)
  • Перинатальный центр, г. Усть-Каменогорск

Ивановская область
  • Медицниский центр «Европа», г. Иваново

Республика Хакасия
  • «Межрайонный родильный дом», г. Черногорск
  • Республиканский клинический перинатальный центр, г. Абакан

Камчатский край
  • Филиал № 2 ФГКУ "1477 Военно-морской клинический госпиталь" МО РФ
Ханты-мансийский Автономный Округ
  • Сургутская городская клиническая больница, г. Сургут
Вологодская область
  • Череповецкий городской родильный дом, г. Череповец
  • Вологодская инфекционная больница, г. Вологда
Республика Тыва
  • Инфекционная больница, г. Кызыл
Яндекс.Метрика